Anil Seth's biological naturalism debated in Behavioral and Brain Sciences commentary from computer science
A commentary published on 17 September in Behavioral and Brain Sciences responds to Anil Seth's target article from the perspective of theoretical computer science. Another analysis argues that machine consciousness has no proven test.
Sources
- Anil Seth’s case for biological naturalism provides a roadmap for a conscious AI | Behavioral and Brain Sciencescambridge.org · Sep 17, 2026
- Valerio Capraro on X: "What is consciousness? Can AI be conscious? In a fascinating new article, Anil Seth develops the case for “biological naturalism”: consciousness may be inseparable from being alive. A biological neuron is not simply a computer that receives an input and “fires” an output.… / Xx.com · Sep 18, 2026
- Conscious artificial intelligence and biological naturalismhraness.com · Sep 19, 2026
- Machine Consciousness Has No Proven Test — and That Gap Is Now Reshaping AImartincid.com · Sep 14, 2026
Machine-generated summary based on the titles and excerpts of the source articles. The facts come from the linked article.